I AM NOT TO BLAME, ARE YOU?

When a streNepalese Child Sniffing Glue from a Sacket child turns to glue sniffing due to hunger, or when a woman is traded as property, or when a product is manufactured by slaves then who is to blame? Me? You?

 There is strong sentiment today that I, the wealthy over fed American, am the culprit. But I offer a different–and I believe fair–assessment. I do not accept that I am the bad guy, nor are you, though we are not without responsibility.

 Children in sweat shops, infants left in the streets, innocent little girls sold into prostitution, are in their circumstances because somewhere a Father did not protect them, a community broke down around them, and very likely, a government chose corruption over its citizens. I understand that difficult straits place some parents in tough circumstances, and that some are deceived when selling their children, but this is not excusable either.

The root problem is an absence of Christ’s form of selfless love in the societal fabric. At the center of all pain, unfairness, warmongering factions, and perversions is a lack of obedience to or understanding of the ways of Jesus.

Oh yes, you and I have a responsibility to aid these suffering little ones. Though I am far from convinced that we are to blame for their plight, I am firmly convinced we are compelled to help them. Indeed, it is out of obedience to and an understanding of the ways of Jesus that we cannot but do so. There is a difference between blame and responsibility.

Give generously: visit www.journeynepal.org and and consider a donation to the needy in Nepal.

Pass along the ways of Jesus: learn how at our upcoming site: www.TheMissionalLife.com

Missional Living and The Green Gospel

Is Green Forbidden Fruit?

Is "Green" the New Forbidden Fruit?

Green has come to mean a lot of things these days.  It is earth-friendly, organic, natural, and green asks us to consider our personal responsibility for the collective global footprint.  Green is also sensitive to the poor and disenfranchised, though intolerant of those insensitive to the same.  It courageously confronts injustice and inequity, and resonates with most of us at some central level. This Green Gospel is good news in many ways, but according to Jesus, it is flawed…..

 Green is popular and green is good, but is green enough? 

“You tithe mint, rue, cumin,” he noted. “You honor the prophet’s tombs by not stepping on them; you are careful to be clean, take care about what you eat, and selective with whom you associate yourselves; yet you miss everything. You ought to continue in your careful attention to these things, but you’re missing the most  important element.” (Obviously, my paraphrase of Jesus’ words)

Their  flaw? They left out Jesus, “You search the Scriptures, but fail to come to me.”  They didn’t see the obvious, “How can you say, show us the Father after I’ve been among you so long?”  His early followers missed the main point, and today’s missional church runs the same risk.

Green is good, but it is not God.

Being green is valuable, but no amount of good works can redeem us.

Works salvation, in any era or color, is never enough. It is in Christ  that all things hold together and have their being.

Controlling carbon emissions is obviously good, but it isn’t ‘spiritual’ (at least for most of us). Few, I would imagine, suspect that driving a more fuel efficient vehicle merits special favor with God. But what about feeding  the poor, or fighting injustice? Don’t those glean points with the Almighty? What about caring for neighbor, listening to the lonely, giving more and living on less? All marks of ‘green’. None marks for righteousness.

No. I’m not out of my mind. Re-read the last sentence of the previous paragraph. “None marks FOR righteousness”.  Certainly they are marks OF righteousness, but in no manner do they merit spiritual ‘rightness’ with God. We are still saved by grace—green movements , red states,  SUV owners and all. Grace is essential. Jesus is our grace. He is essential. The Green Gospel will include Him as essential.

Missional living must include the good news story of Jesus. Jesus is the original missional life; from Him we gain our cues on how to rightly be ‘green’. We learn from Him how to love the unlovely—even those unlovely who don’t love the unlovely. We learn to care for the earth– in balance with caring for those created to care for the earth, but who don’t. In Him we witness an advocate for the oppressed take on human injustice without bending a bruised reed (meekly). We find an anti-establishmentarian who rejects public protest (he slipped quietly into Jerusalem). And above all else, we find one who can do for us what no amount of good green living can; we find a savior.  

This is the fatal flaw of the green movement—it cannot save. It cannot re-ligament us to God. We can save the planet and loose our selves (gain the whole world and forfeit our souls). We can spend ourselves on the poor and do all manner of good, but apart from a living relationship with Jesus all our righteousness is filthy rags. “But Lord! Didn’t we cast out demons? Didn’t we control carbon emissions? Didn’t we speak against injustice?” some will offer. But those aren’t the crux of it. They never have been and they won’t be, ever.

It all about re-linking with God. That’s the goal. That is THE center of our existence.

Then. Once that is in place. After our relationship with God has been reestablished. We can begin, truly begin, rightly begin to love our neighbor by providing him with cleaner drinking water, paying him a fair wage, giving to him more generously, listening more intently, standing with him when possible, even dying  for him when necessary.

Why can’t we do all these without Jesus? We can, almost. We can give, serve, love, share, even die. But we cannot save. And our neighbor needs salvation. He needs to re-link, to re-ligament with God. Only Jesus does that. That’s why we cannot go green without Jesus.

Therefore, as you preach ‘green’…include the Gospel….better yet…..emphasize it.

It’s Not About The Disposable Diapers

    

Mother Theresa demonstrates the simple life: A One Life.

Mother Theresa Demonstrated a "One" Lifestyle.

My wife and I lived in rural Africa for a decade. We saw the poverty. I recall entering the hut where a grandmother who was over 100 years old lay dying. Her entire life’s collection of possessions amounted to a cup, a bowl, her dress, some gourds, sticks and a cat.

     Donna and I began our family during those years. Unable to bear the “wasteful lifestyle” of our fellow Americans, we were convinced that disposable diapers and paper towels were ‘wrong’, and so opted for washable, reusable cloth diapers and wash cloths (Sometimes the former became the latter after many, many uses). Our sensitive-concerned-less-stuff-lifestyle became a badge of righteousness for us, and I’m afraid we weren’t as grace filled as we should have been.

      Though that was years ago, and our children have grown up, the ‘stuff debate’ continues. My son is working in Nepal just now and debating whether or not to buy goods manufactured in China with cheap labor. With the Christmas shopping binge behind us, Americans are out shopping again…for storage containers! Stuff is an issue for all of us affluent westerners. What do we do with it…the issue…and the stuff?

     Most secularists and, I’m afraid some in the missional thinking movement, have missed guided us on this one by suggesting that the issue is “our stuff”.  I propose that, even for Jesus, it wasn’t about giving up disposable diapers or about the amount, type, or quality of stuff. Rather, I believe that “simple living” is the great virtue esteemed in Scripture. However, the notion that simple living means doing with less stuff is not true simplicity. Biblical simplicity is much more profound and much more simple than that.

      I copied this quote from a blog devoted to missional living. It illustrates what most people think when they think about a simple lifestyle. 

     “The idea of a more simple lifestyle is something I have been pondering recently. The current state of the economy just makes it all that more important. I recently came across the free ebook by Leo Babauta, “Thriving on Less—Simplifying in a Tough Economy” to help us all do better with less.”

      This sounds good, doesn’t it? It sounds very Christian in fact. I mean, Jesus had no place to put his head. The disciples left everything they had to follow him, and we are certainly not to be attached to this world. All true. But asceticism never has been God’s idea for us.

      You’re backing away from me, aren’t you? Don’t. Listen, carefully.

       What some are advocating these days sounds a lot like the old idea that sleeping on nails has merit with God–it doesn’t. Being poor is no more righteous than being rich. What you do with what you have is of importance to God, but it has very little to do with the virtue of simple living. God’s emphasis is not on giving away your stuff or on wearing old clothes or owning only one pair of shoes or on driving a bicycle instead of an SUV. Those are secular concerns, pop culture fads in many ways…..really, they are. So, what is Biblical simplicity?

      Biblically, simplicity is singularness. It is a facet of the heart. It is having One at the center– One Lord; One Faith; One God. It is commitment to one kingdom. It is a focus of life and a center from which every other action is born.

       It is the mind of Paul, “One thing I do…”. It is the mind of Jesus, “I and the Father are One…”

      Simplicity is a worldview from which values, beliefs, and actions spring. It puts God at the center…God alone. From that center, we decide to shuttle our SUVs and ride bikes or walk. From it we decide to own 1 pair of pants or a closet full of clothes. The important factor, then, is not whether we sleep in cardboard or a penthouse, it is why we sleep there, and why we drive or walk, and for what purpose of God’s do we shop at one store or another one. Some shop only unionized stores—fine, others shop Wal-mart—fine too; provided each shops with God’s purposes in mind.

      One boycotts Wal-mart because they buy from child-labor shops at unfair wages. Another shops at the same store because the store provides employment for a neighbor. Neither are wrong. Neither better than the other. Both are living from a simple center—the will of God.

 

     As I began, missional people live simply, but doing with less stuff is not necessarily simple living. Jesus had little; King David had much—both had a heart after God. Stuff, much or little,  is not the standard for measure. “One” is the measure.

      Lance Armstrong coined the phrase “Live Strong.” If Jesus had a rubber wrist band it would say, “Live One.”

      Grace to all.

Missional Living “Crackles”

 Marks of the missional life, according to www.friendsofmissional.com , include a move

  • From attractional to incarnational
  • From professional to passionate
  • From decisions to disciples
  • And I would add, from non-faith to some-faith to more-faith….

This video illustrates the incremental path that missional living takes to turn hearts to God. Note how this Atheist’s head (heart?) has been turned just a little…. not so much with words, but through Christ in a man.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JHS8adO3hM 

 (Press “ctrl” and click to view. It may open in another window.)

Live it. Stephen

Missional Living in a Down Economy: Part 2

“Who do we help and who do we permit to crash when times are tough?”
Missional people cannot allow the powerful tide of the bailout to pull us away from the sure footings of Christ’s compassion.

Jesus saw the crowd was hungry and ordered his men, “Hey, feed these folks.” They couldn’t, so, he did. (John 6). We’d expect such compassion from Jesus, wouldn’t we? But what happened the next morning is not what we’d expect.

The crowds found Jesus. He noted their hunger and said, “I’m not giving you even a bread crumb.”

Same Jesus. Same crowd. What happened? Was it a long restless night on the cold hard ground or what? It is imperative we understand why Jesus demonstrated his compassion on one day and did not on the next. We trust that an inner compass guided Jesus’ actions on both days, and as missional people we certainly desire that compass for ourselves. 

 So, what made the difference?

Read more…